Now, that is a choice, isn't it? For a squad-sight sniper, that usually stands kilometres away from the nearest opponent, you get to choose between a 'close combat' and a 'grenadier' :) Nguyên văn bởi subscriber:The 'Training Roulette' is not a perfect fun all of the time, because sometimes (though really rarely, indeed) you might get to choose between a useless and even more useless perk: Just happy it didn't take me half the game to get one this time. Mostly because run and gun is such a strong ability, and since support no longer has a monopoly on anything but smoke grenade they feel less impactful.Īlso, while I am on a soap box, been doing the army of four achievement this last game, and if you want a set of options that strongly mitigate the impact of late game gear-flation army of four + Training Roulette is it.Ĭurrently got my lightning reflexes on a heavy. I do feel that it reduces supports to irrelevance. There are some choices where you are like, 'totally taking that', but a lot of them are, 'man I want both of those, damn.' Is immunity to critical hits stronger than sprinter? Those sorts of choices. The fun part is Training Roulette forces all these choices on you that you never got to make before. Occasionally you get a combination of abilities and go, 'that is OP', but then you think, 'naw it is just my other soldiers are sucking lol'. (Try running half the game without Lightning Reflexes for example). I think the reason is that in a lot of ways, the default classes themselves are OP, so a lot of the time with Training Roulette you find yourself chasing strong abilities that you would get trivially without it on. Not Created Equally and Hidden Potential just let you create super soldiers in a short amount of time, but Training Roulette does not have as over-powered a feel. I feel like most of the second wave options have serious flaws, but Training Roulette is not one of them.

Xcom enemy unknown training roulette